CommissionsPublic Works INew WorksPanelsSculpture
A Plethora of Random Thoughts and other Pertinent Information

A little gathering in Austin

Saturday, February 26th, 2011

I’ve recently returned from the annual SAMA (Society of American Mosaic Artists) Conference in Austin, Texas. Cool town, that Austin. More like Boulder or Madison- progressive and full of culture and laid back-ness. This annual event is always different; it varies because of the locale (ie:San Diego in 2009, Chicago 2010) and because of the participants who travel from across the nation and across the globe. For artists and enthusiasts, inspiration can be found in the MAI Exhibition (this year at the Mexican American Cultural Center), the many workshop offerings over a three day period (Guilio Menossi, Ilana Shafir, Pamela Irving, and Gary Drostle just to name a few..) and the presentations. This year the Keynote Speaker was Pamela Irving, who gave a refreshing look into her projects, her process and the development of her visual vocabulary. I think her honestly and lack of pretension was embraced by the SAMA audience.

There were several other notable presentations, particularly a screening a film about artist El Anatsui, who is catagorized as a “found object artist”. Thanks to Rhonda Heisler for introducing him to the mosaic arts community, who seemed to connect to his process. British Artist Gary Drostle told the story of the creation of his “River of Life” commission at the University of Iowa; a commission plagued by volcanoes, studio fires, and installation challenges. A beautiful work. Sophie Drouin introduced many uninitiated into the world of “Dalle de Verre” – a way working with thick, slab glass. Sherri Warner Hunter lead a panel on Community Built Mosaics with Chicago artist Tracy Van Duinen and New Orleans based artist Laurel True. Tracy’s Bricolage mural with Chicago’s American Indian Community and Laurel True’s incredible work with children in Haiti were featured and left the audience moved and grateful for their work in these communities. The last panel was a discussion called” Defining Mosaic Art- Who Cares, and Why?”. The majority of the panelists did not care to define anything , and aside from Jean Ann Dabb’s terrific introduction referring to the historic timeline of the word ‘mosaic’- the majority of the panelists seemed more interested in discussing marketing for artists versus discussion  about why people who identify themselves as mosaic artists gather in the same room. It was certainly a topic of conversation after the conference. Advice is like cooking- you should try it first before you feed it to others.

I led a series of gallery talks at the MAI Exhibition (work above by Andryea Natkin) over a period of 3 days. There were anywhere from 20 to 50 people gathering to look at the works, discuss them critically, and to ask questions about the exhibition, the jurying process and the individual artists. Talking about work honestly, not being afraid to say you like or don’t like the work – and more importantly, why, was a new experience to many. I think that in general, the public is too  shy or embarrassed to say they don’t understand a work of art. The MAI talks gave everyone a safe forum to look and listen and contribute, and the participants engaged in lively and conversation about the show.

And the multitudes of volunteers who make a massive undertaking like a SAMA Conference possible have to be acknowledged. particularly the Austin Mosaic Guild. The AMG made their presence known to visitors as soon as they disembarked form their airplanes at the airport- there was great display of small works by members of the guild throughout the concourse. Karin Gerstinhaber and Deborah Immel were the Austin SAMA co-chairs that made this conference ‘like butter’.

And a shout out to two Uber-humans, Dawnmarie Zimmerman and Chris Forillo, who I love and respect dearly- not just for all the work they do, or the passion they have for SAMA, but because they are two of my favorite people on the planet. SAMA would not be SAMA without these two, who have these conferences down to an art form.

I will be following up soon with a review of the MAI Exhibition.

Does Art speak louder than words?

Sunday, February 6th, 2011

I am perplexed by the segment of artists, art critics and art collectors who rely on words to shore up or justify the complexity of a piece of visual art. Art is communication; it is something that can tell a story, spark a memory, or create an association that will take the viewer to another place. Sometimes it is not easy or simple to know what we are looking at- it is our own discovery of that work (appealing or not) that enriches our senses.

As an artist and curator, I believe that work should be compelling visually, but must also be compelling conceptually. I don’t want to see an artists statement that explains the artists’ intention -the work should stand on its own merit visually. It is at this point where muddled ideas attempt to excuse dull execution. An idea that surpasses the training and skills that enhance an artists vocabulary is neither a successful work of art or a fully conceived idea. One must marry the two. I don’t buy the bullshit excuse from neo-conceptualists that art students should spend more time talking about ideas than creating artwork – it perpetuates the ‘cult of the ego-artist’. In some ways, conceptual art is an excuse for artistic laziness driven by shock value. It is a decades old faux-rebellion against the commerce and object driven art world – a world that the rebels ache to be a part of!

The beauty of all art is that it ultimately is in the eye of the beholder. I do not want to be told to think about something when nothing is there. Send me a postcard, an email. That is a sow’s ear not a silk purse. I don’t want you to explain what happens at the end of the film before I see it for myself-it is about discovery. The experience of seeing a sculpture or painting or mosaic is mine to explore and discover with my eyes and mind. I don’t want to read the philosophical musings of an unfinished idea – I want to see something that I can muse about. When we put our work out there. it no longer belongs to us.. it belongs to those who take it in. When viewers have to rely on a foundation of artistic statements to justify a work it becomes a weak excuse for poorly executed ideas.

Here is a wonderful essay /rant by British writer Chris Sharratt published on Axisweb on this subject:

What is art if not a form of communication, a way to say something that cannot be said using language alone?

Great art speaks for itself.

It requires our undivided attention and an open yet critical mind, but apart from that it needs no explanation for it to convey its message.

Of course galleries don’t always exhibit great art.

Often it is mediocre, the message unclear and the end result uncompelling.

However much undivided attention we give, it fails to do what all the best art should – to make us think about the who, what and why of our lives and the world around us.

This failure to deliver is, in a way, all part of the dialogue of contemporary art.

Communicating ideas isn’t easy – better to try and fail than to not try at all.

Yet there is another dialogue that so often accompanies bad art, and which is far harder to forgive – the interpretation text penned by the artist/curator/gallery staff.

Done well, this can add context and background information that enhances the gallery experience.

Yet far too often it acts as a smokescreen, a roll-call of art-speak gobbledegook that baffles rather than enlightens.

There is, I think, a pattern to this; the more lightweight the concept, the greater the tendency towards obscuration.

It’s as if the writer is trying to convince themselves that there are hidden depths in the shallow ideas set before them.

Big words and complex sentence structures are offered up as some kind of validation.

If you don’t get it, well, you just don’t get it.

Text like this is worse than useless – it just gets in the way of our experience and wastes paper.

It’s always better to let the art do the talking than obscure the picture.

http://www.axisweb.org/dlForum.aspx?ESSAYID=18135